0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
New book arrived yesterday, all new pictures and much more detail than the older Series 1 version from 1996. A great read for the 80” enthusiast. A second edition covering the other Series 1 models to follow next year I believe Sent from my iPhone using LRSOC
1996???
One can pre-order here https://www.amazon.co.uk/-/en/James-Taylor/dp/1906133905 .
Is such bonkers long-distance commerce the only way forward. ?
Available on ebay for much less,£27 i believe
Grate book.
Graeme, don't tell me STRIKE garden centre.
So I received my copy this week and am working my way through it. It appears to be an excellently produced book, but I'm currently reading the Chassis, Axles etc. chapter and have a number of comments/questions.p30 Bumper Quote:"All production 80-inch Land Rovers had a detachable front bumper, and on the earliest models this was galvanised to improve it's durability. However after about 150-200 vehicles had been built, it was simply painted silver...." (end quote) Surely this is not right, all series land rover bumpers are galvanised aren't they? James is conflating the Bumper and the Chassis here?P31 Gearbox (no 4) cross-memberQuote:"This was bolted to the underside of the side rails, with two bolts either side" (end quote)Again, was this _ever_ the case? I thought only later military series land rovers had removable gearbox cross members, certainly standard production 80"s don't .P32 OutriggersQuote:"All chassis had two box-section outriggers on each side, welded outboard of the side rails" (end quote) James then talks about bulkhead cross members and goes on to say (quote) " the second outrigger on each side was alongside no5 on front body support cross-member" (end quote) Are these "box section" on any 80" ? I believed they were always an inverted U section (i.e open at the bottom) unlike the bulkhead ones which are box-section ?Sorry if this seems like I'm nit picking on what is in many ways an excellent book, but if like the last book this becomes a go to guide for restores, it would be good to ensure it is as accurate as possible ? Of course I may be wrong in all of the above - this is always a good possibility